What Is the Logical 'Not' In Prolog?

In Prolog, the logical 'not' is denoted by the operator '+'. This operator is used to perform negation as failure, meaning that it can be used to check if a certain statement is not provable or cannot be derived from the given facts and rules in the program. The 'not' operator is typically used in conjunction with other predicates to handle situations where a certain condition is not true. It is important to note that the 'not' operator in Prolog is not the same as classical negation as it does not necessarily prove that a statement is false, but rather that it cannot be proven to be true.

How can the logical 'not' be used to handle uncertainty in Prolog?

In Prolog, the logical 'not' operator can be used to handle uncertainty by allowing the programmer to specify negation as failure. This means that when a predicate is called with the 'not' operator in front of it, Prolog will try to find a solution for the predicate. If Prolog cannot find a solution (i.e. the predicate fails), it will return true. This can help handle uncertainty by allowing the programmer to express that a certain fact is not known to be true, rather than explicitly stating that it is false.

For example, consider a predicate has_access(X), which determines if a user has access to a particular resource. If it is uncertain whether a user has access, the programmer can use the 'not' operator to handle this uncertainty:

1
2
3

uncertain_access(X) :-
   not(has_access(X)),
   write('Access is uncertain for user X').

In this example, if Prolog cannot find a solution for has_access(X), it will return true and print a message indicating that access is uncertain for user X. This allows the programmer to handle uncertainty in a more flexible and expressive way using the logical 'not' operator in Prolog.

How can the logical 'not' be used to create negation in Prolog?

In Prolog, the logical not can be used to create negation by checking if a certain condition is not true. This can be done using the built-in predicate not/1 in Prolog.

For example, consider the following predicate that defines the parent-child relationship:

1
2

parent(john, mark).
parent(jane, mark).

To create a rule that defines a person as a grandparent if they are the parent of a parent, we can use the logical not to check that the person is not a parent of the child in question:

1

grandparent(X, Y) :- parent(X, Z), parent(Z, Y), not(parent(X, Y)).

In this example, grandparent(X, Y) will be true if X is a grandparent of Y, but is not the parent of Y directly. The not(parent(X, Y)) condition ensures that X is not a parent of Y.

How does the logical 'not' interact with other Prolog predicates?

In Prolog, the logical "not" operator is denoted by the predicate "+" or "not". It is used to express negation-as-failure, meaning that a predicate is false if Prolog cannot prove it to be true.

When the "not" operator is used in conjunction with other Prolog predicates, it evaluates the truth value of the predicate according to the following rules:

1. If the predicate succeeds (returns true), then the "not" operator fails (returns false).
2. If the predicate fails (returns false), then the "not" operator succeeds (returns true).

For example:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10

likes(john, pizza).
likes(mary, pizza).

is_vegetarian(X) :- \+ likes(X, pizza).

?- is_vegetarian(john).
false.

?- is_vegetarian(mary).
true.

In the above example, the predicate "likes(john, pizza)" is true, so the "not" operator fails, resulting in "is_vegetarian(john)" evaluating to false. However, "likes(mary, pizza)" is false, so the "not" operator succeeds, resulting in "is_vegetarian(mary)" evaluating to true.